Thursday 17 January 2013

The important point to be considered by CA OR G.D.C.A while doing audits of Co-operative Housing Society.


Matters to be included in the Audit By CA & G.D.C.A     
   
Inclusion of follow matters under Section 81 (2) of the Maharashtra Co- operative Societies Act, 1960 is obligatory in the report of the Audit.

    Cash balance and investment and societys liability and valuation of  property.

 If   the decision  like  unreasonable  penaltyunjustifiable charging and  charging excess  charges in respect of transference fee/ non occupancy charges then the directions in that regard are taken and implemented on the level of society, then it is obligatory to give remarks and instructions for  action to be taken should be made in the audit report otherwise the main  purpose of rectification of faults in the societies working would not be  served       
            
 While  doing  the objective evolution of  the  financial  transactions of  the society, it is necessary to check the matters like whether renewal of the funds was made or not prescribed procedures for incurring expenditure on major repairing work was followed or not and accordingly mentioned clear remarks and instructions should be mentioned in the audit report.            
     
     
     In addition, it is obligatory for the benefit of the society to inspect following  matters  which  are  generall neglected  b the  auditor  in respect of Housing Societies and include the remarks thereof in the audit report

 Whether the personal expense is put under the head of profit and loss account?

Whether the society has made expenses in fulfilling the purpose or not?

 Whether the interest of the society is hurt by making transaction with book entry.

 Whether the Society is fulfilling liability toward a member or not?

 Whether  legal  proceedings  was  initiated  in  tim against  the  default members?

Whether Conveyance Deed is in favour of society or not?

 Whether all transfers of share is as per bye-laws or Not ?

Whether membership of the Housing Federation [Dist. OR Taluka  levelis taken onot? And payment of an annual fee of the said federation is made or not?     
                    
Whether the bonds executed under section 73 (1) (AB) are proper in view of statutory or not i.e. M-20 BONDS are executed ? M-20 bond execution is exempted for housing society whose election result declared after 06Th September 2012 as per order issued by the Secretary of Co-operation     
              
 Whether the payment of Education  Cess was made to”MAHARASHTRA  RAJYA SAHAKARI SANGH LTD “  not? 

Whether reconciliation and financial statements up to the last date of inspection was inspected or not?    

Whether the profit & loss statement in the financial year are inspected or not?  And  whether  th remarks  and  instructions  in  that  respect  are included or not?

 Whether all records necessary for auditor was available for audit and was it sufficient as per his knowledge and belief for auditing?

Whether the society has kept necessary books as per law, rules and bye- laws?  And whether  the re-conciliation and profit and loss statement match with the ledger books of the society.

 If the answer is negative in this matter, then that deficiency should be noted in the audit report with reason as per rule 69(5).

In addition to this if the matters which are to be taken seriously in the audit report in conformity  with the following points then it is necessary to note that separately in the remarks of the auditor.

1.       Transactions took place in violation of law, rules, bye-laws.
2.       The details of those amounts which was to be taken into account but not taken.
3.       Improper and irregular expenditure.
4.       Dubious and bad amounts.
5.       Matters prescribed by the Registrar

Auditor shall check the following Register /Records /Document of Society

1. " I " Register
2. " J " Register
3. Sinking Fund Register
4. Share Registe
5. Nomination Register
6. Investment Register
7. Mortgage Register
8. Property Register
9.Monthly Register
10. Cash Book Register
11. General Register

Auditor shall check the all page of above register. Tick with Green Pen and on the Last Entry of each register Auditor Sign along with check on date must written.

Auditor shall also check all Transfer of Share Certificate Document 
Auditor shall also check each and every Minutes of Monthly Working Committee Meeting , AGM & SAGM with Green Pen and Audior Sign along with Check date at the end of every Minutes of  Meeting must written on the MCM & AGM Minutes Book













4 comments:

  1. May i know why comments successfully posted and promptly disclosed today morning are now found missing ?!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This blog is only for housing society which is registered under maharashtra co operative society act 1960. Not for other state. So it was remove

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The response is, in one's well thought of view and conviction, rather a narrow / in- box perception, hence not quite convincing. For, the deficiencies of a serious nature in the actual audit functions of a CA , as pinpointed, if not all of them but at least some of them, if scouted around, might be noted to equally apply/obtain, -for that matter with more severity, to not only KAR but every other state, constituting a part of the UNION. May be, if cared to, for enlightenment, may look up some of the insightful viewpoints on the growingly vexing topic of Union v State (s) in a couple of the published writings/ speeches of the widely acclaimed legal legend- late ‘nani’.
      It ought to have been noted that, further, with the material developments in recent times of every general and common significance to all states e.g Regulatory for Reality and 97th Amendment of the Constitution embrace and have already proved/ for obvious reasons bound to be of national concern; not simply concern of just one of its states. Hence, the comments were posted on this blog, despite being fully conscious that it has reference only to MAHA.
      Not being inclined to dilate any further, for sake of professional decency and courtesy, the minimum that could have been done is to either inform me before simplistically removing. In any case, now that the comments which seemingly have been removed without giving a second thought, i expect that those be sent to me by e'mail; thereby save me from the avoidable hassle am confronted with, as indicated in my 'rejoinder' @ praja.in (- being the website i have been interacting over for quite some time now). Also help me to once again fwd to those others, including ICAI, to whom a feedback was sent ; as it is possible all of them may not have had an occasion to take a note of the message sought to be conveyed through the subject comments, because of the abrupt removal thereof at your end.
      (though left unedited, message sought to be conveyed as above may be found to be clear and sound enough, at least for the nonce/present purpose in mind)

      Delete
  3. On a second thought, driven by reasons of compassion, to one's quick recollection, in MAHA there are instances in which the statutory audits (of not just the CHS but of the ralated "promoters)'do or may infer-ably not have been carried out strictly in the manner expected or desired. A couple of such instances, being suspect, are in re - 'Podar Cement' (IT case), and 'Nahalchand' (property law case) . if inclined to know more, especially of the surrounding facts, the SC judgments may be intuitively read; also the 'critique' on those judgments published @ Taxguru.com.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.